|
Americans are treated to a constant media barrage
about functional literacy problems and the crisis in America's public primary
and secondary education system.
But there is more to meaningful literacy than
merely being able to recognize the written word and being able to write it.
To understand the law shell game, the individual
must become politically and jurally literate. That is the subject of the
3-volume Win Your Traffic Case
manuals.
But succeeding in acquiring political and jural
literacy will also require becoming linguistically literate.
Few Americans are linguistically literate to include most lawyers as well as
judges – particularly those of the variety who sit in traffic courts.
In some states, a traffic court judge may have no law training at all,
notwithstanding having a degree from a law school gives no certification to the
“law graduate” being epistemologically, a.k.a. linguistically, literate in
law language, nor that the “law graduate” is
politically literate regarding the language of political law, and
therefore, gives no certification that the “law graduate” is jurally
literate in any substantive or procedural body of law relating to governing
authority.
“Linguistically literate”
means versed in the nature and limitations of language as medium for all
abstract thinking, reasoning, and communication of one's thoughts. It means
knowledgeable in the Science of Epistemology, and particularly in the sub field
of general semantics. It means
ability to recognize and overcome the many forms of fallacy.
Fallacies are linguistic nonsense passing for valid facts, but which can
be challenged and shown to be nonsense.
Without such knowledge, the
individual cannot adequately comprehend the language of law, thus can have no
sufficient understanding of the game of law. For law is uniquely a metaphysical
indulgence dependent entirely upon words recklessly and intentionally
constructed into innumerable forms of fallacy, words misunderstood for lack of
message contexts in which the words are used, words whose abstractness is never
properly questioned, etc.
The domain of law devours the
epistemological illiterate -- that is the linguistic illiterate. The author's
second workshop, SECRETS OF SUCCESSFUL ARGUMENT IN THE COURTROOM AND ELSEWHERE,
introduces the reader to essential elements of linguistic literacy.
Without linguistic literacy, the
task of overcoming political and jural literacy is made difficult, if not
impossible.
The second workshop, SECRETS OF SUCCESSFUL ARGUMENT IN THE COURTROOM AND ELSEWHERE,
in two volumes comprised of over 220 pages and includes as a separate volume
a copy of FALLACY: The
Counterfeit of Argument, an encyclopedic work reviewing
many forms of fallacious arguments. To order, click here.
Regarding this second workshop, SECRETS
OF SUCCESSFUL ARGUMENT IN THE COURTROOM AND ELSEWHERE, be aware that success in
becoming politically and jurally literate sufficient to the task of exercising
your inherent political power/unalienable rights will depend entirely upon the degree of
your linguistic literacy.
There is more to linguistic
literacy than having access to and being able to read dictionaries and knowing
the essentials of English grammar. Dictionaries and study of grammar do not
address the fallacies inherent in most human language communications,
notwithstanding the epistemological importance of a meaningful foundation in
English grammar.
Fallacy is omnipresent in man's
communications, but truly reigns supreme in matters of law and the game of
governance.
Discover how to read the law in order to separate illusions and
deceptions of authority in your individual case.
Do
not be so quick as to presume you understand the language of law and do not be
so quick as to presume the traffic court judge and prosecutor understand the
language of law. They almost never
understand the law governing traffic law administration and enforcement.
They are almost always found
to be linguistically illiterate in the language of law and, therefore, they are
almost always found to be politically and jurally illiterate such that they have
no proper understanding of the limitations of their authority, the law they
presume to enforce, or when and how they violate your rights to due process,
etc.
Discover
how to put the burden of law and order on the judge and the prosecutor in your
case.
|